PERFORMANCEX
A short workshop for Maritza's team on what PerformanceX is, what it means for you, and why it exists.
PerformanceX reflects your work back to you each week. The wins worth repeating. The moments worth noticing. The small adjustments that quietly add up to a stronger career.
"Your work, your growth, your judgment is what makes this team run. The platform exists to make that visible."
No surveys. No tracking. No extra steps. It looks at your emails, your meetings, your case notes. The work, not the worker.
Every week, a structured report just for you. What's working, what to improve, what's coming next. No surprises, no guesswork.
Every "improve" comes with a concrete suggestion. Not "do better" but "try this exact rewrite." Specific, not vague.
A short email from AllOne Health Reports, with a link to your full performance report.
Before the work week starts. Same time, every week. You can plan around it.
A no-reply sender, designed to feel like internal company communication. Not spam, not external.
Greeting, a one-paragraph framing, and what to expect inside the report. The full detail lives in the linked document, not in the email.
Your individual report is private. Maritza sees her own report and a team-level overview, but not your individual one unless you choose to share it.
Six sections. Real evidence. Specific recommendations. Yours to read privately.
Built to be read top-to-bottom like a short report. No logins. No menus. Just open it and read.
Six sections, each with a clear purpose. You can read the whole thing or skip to the section that matters most.
Every observation links back to a specific moment from your week. Nothing is interpretation or vibes. You can read the source for yourself.
The next four slides break the report into pieces: how to read the score, what the wins mean, how the development cards work, and how it all rolls into next week.
The score lives next to a written summary that explains what drove it. 90-100 is exceptional. 80-89 strong. 70-79 on track. Below 70, we should be talking.
You see how you compare to last week, the team average, and others in your role. It's there to give context, not to create competition.
Reliability, Engagement, Culture, Project Health, Talent & Growth, Risk & Recognition. Each one moves up or down with the week.
The most important panel on the page. It's not a to-do list. It's the smallest set of things that, if done, would move your score the most.
Each win names the moment, the dimension it touched, and the exact quote that earned the call-out. No vague "good job" energy.
So you can go back, read it, and remember exactly what you did. This is the difference between feedback you can use and feedback you'll forget.
Most wins happen instinctively. This section reverse-engineers them so you can deliberately repeat them.
Not a generic principle. A specific action you can repeat next week. The point: turn one good moment into a habit.
FIX means resolve this week. WATCH means a small pattern to monitor. GROW means a next-level habit to develop.
No interpretation, no spin. Just the email, the message, the line that triggered the observation. You read it and decide for yourself.
This is the part employees usually love. You see exactly what to say differently next time. Same intent, sharper outcome.
A single line that names the habit. Once you can name it, you can change it. The point: evidence, not judgment.
The fix, the watch, the grow. Tackle one. Tackle all three. The score nudges up either way.
Five clear actions. Each one would meaningfully move the needle if you did it. None require permission, training, or extra time.
The platform forecasts where you're heading based on your trajectory. If burnout risk goes yellow, that's a real-time warning, not a backward-looking diagnosis.
If you only read one section, read this. Same takeaways as everything above, condensed for a busy week. The point: the report ends with what to do, not how you did.
No agents. No browser extensions. No software on your device.
Some team members received early reports before this conversation. We want to be open about that. It was an early glimpse of the platform before the framing around it was ready. The reports themselves were accurate; the timing landed before the context.
With Maritza's introduction and Jill's session today, you'll have the framing those early reports were missing.